An Iowa case that stunned investigators and devastated a community has reached a major turning point, as a young mother has been convicted in the death of her 7-month-old daughter—despite initially offering what authorities say was a misleading explanation for the child’s injuries.
Sheyenne Shore, 26, was found guilty of first-degree murder and child endangerment in connection with the 2023 death of her infant, Xena. The case, detailed by local and regional reporting, centered on a series of severe and ultimately fatal injuries that medical experts say could not have been accidental.
The tragedy came to light on June 11, 2023, when Shore brought her baby to a hospital in Story County, Iowa. By the time they arrived, medical staff quickly realized something was terribly wrong. According to court documents, the infant showed no signs of life—her body already cold and rigid. Efforts to revive her were unsuccessful, and she was pronounced dead shortly thereafter.
What doctors discovered next raised immediate alarm.

Medical personnel documented multiple injuries across the baby’s body, including bruises, cuts, a broken wrist, and internal bleeding. Perhaps most disturbing, they also identified signs of older, healing fractures—indicating the child may have suffered prior harm over time. The medical examiner later concluded that the injuries, particularly those involving the head, were not consistent with an accident and ruled the death a homicide.
When questioned by authorities, Shore reportedly claimed that her daughter had hit her head on toys during “tummy time,” a common developmental activity for infants. The child’s father, Juan Montalvo Jr., echoed the same explanation. Both denied knowledge of how the more serious injuries occurred.
But investigators soon uncovered inconsistencies in that account.
Surveillance footage and store receipts revealed that Shore had left her apartment on the day of the baby’s death—contradicting her earlier statement that she had been with the child the entire time. Montalvo, meanwhile, was reportedly elsewhere in town that day.
Text messages presented in court painted a timeline of events leading up to the discovery of the infant’s condition. Shore began contacting Montalvo in the afternoon, telling him the baby was unresponsive and that she was taking her to the hospital. Less than an hour later, she sent a message stating that the child had died.
Further raising questions, authorities found bloodstained baby items inside the couple’s apartment during a search.
In the aftermath of the child’s death, both Shore and Montalvo left Iowa and traveled to California. They were later arrested and charged in connection with the case.
Montalvo eventually pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of child endangerment causing serious injury and was sentenced to up to 10 years in prison. Shore, however, faced more serious charges and maintained her case through trial, which ultimately ended in her conviction.
She is now awaiting sentencing, scheduled for early June.
The case has drawn widespread attention not only for its heartbreaking details but also for the stark contrast between the initial explanation and the medical findings. Prosecutors argued that the severity and pattern of injuries told a very different story—one of repeated harm rather than a tragic accident.
For many, the outcome offers a measure of accountability, though it does little to ease the profound loss at the center of the case.
As the legal process moves toward sentencing, the focus now turns to what consequences Shore will face—and how a tragedy like this could have unfolded behind closed doors without intervention sooner.





